stand der Dinge semantische Suche

googleguy hat geschrieben:Any clue as to the possible role greater reliance on semantics is playing in your never ending quest for more relevant results?"

I'd say that's inevitable over time. The goal of a good search engine should be both to understand what a document is really about, and to understand (from a very short query) what a user really wants. And then match those things as well as possible. Better semantic understanding helps with both those prerequisites and makes the matching easier.

So a good example is stemming. Stemming is basically SEO-neutral, because spammers can create doorway pages with word variants almost as easily as they can to optimize for a single phrase (maybe it's a bit harder to fake realistic doorways now, come to think of it). But webmasters who never think about search engines don't bother to include word variants--they just write whatever natural text they would normally write. Stemming allows us to pull in more good documents that are near-matches. The example I like is [cert advisory]. We can give more weight to www.cert.org/advisories/ because the page has both "advisory" and "advisories" on the page, and "advisories" in the url. Standard stemming isn't necessarily a win for quality, so we took a while and found a way to do it better.

So yes, I think semantics and document/query understanding will be more important in the future. pavlin, I hope that partly answers the second of the two questions that you posted way up near the start of this thread. If not, please ask it again in case I didn't understand it correctly the first time.

I think semantics and document/query understanding will be more important in the future

Fruetel hat geschrieben:Wobei der Googleguy mal wieder viel geredet hat, ohne etwas zu sagen - manchmal frage ich mich, ob er in der Politik gut aufgehoben wäre.

I think semantics and document/query understanding will be more important in the future

Er denkt (nicht weiss), dass Semantik in der Zukunft (Dieses Jahr? Nächstes? 2050?) eine wichtigere (wie wichtig?) Rolle spielen wird.