Liebe Leute, Ihr diskuttiert hier rum und keiner von Euch hat irgendwo weiter gelesen.
Zitat
https://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/ ... search.php:
“The suit reflects growing concern in segments of the business, media and academic communities about the economic, social and civic dominance of Google, especially as most Web users come to accept the engine’s returns and rankings as definitive, and Google refuses to increase the transparency of its processes while remaining generally unaccountable. Google maintains that the “voting” model of its PageRank technology ensures that its search results are both democratic and as objective as possible.”
Und hier noch was anderes schönes:
https://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?ID=275385
"KinderStart said its traffic plunged by 70 percent after Google dropped it. At its peak, KinderStart’s visitors viewed more than 10 million Web pages per month, according to the suit.
Yu hopes to prove Google has become an “essential facility” that should be required to warn Web sites before dropping them from the index. “We don’t really feel there is enough transparency and openness in a service that has become so important,” Yu said.
Google has always been tightlipped about how its search engine’s works, maintaining the secrecy is essential to its success.
"
@robbelsche, bitte zitier hier nicht dauernd aus dem Zusammenhang gerissene Sätze, auch wenn Du sie falsch verstanden haben solltest. Vor allem nicht meine. Mach ich ja bei Dir auch nicht.
